Insider Risk

What is the Critical Pathway to Insider Risk (CPIR)?

Lucas Seewald | October 30, 2024

Exploring the Critical Pathway to Insider Risk

10:16

Insider risk remains one of the most challenging threats for organisations to manage. The Critical Pathway to Insider Risk (CPIR) offers a structured approach to understanding and mitigating this threat by examining the pathway of events and factors leading to insider acts. This model is based on extensive research into the behaviours and characteristics of individuals who have committed insider acts or exhibited concerning behaviours. Understanding CPIR helps organisations identify potential risks early and take preventive measures. Here, we delve into the components of the CPIR.

Watch the Video: Understanding the Critical Pathway to Insider Risk

To better grasp the concept of CPIR, watch this brief video that explains the key stages and factors that contribute to insider risk. This visual guide will provide a clear and concise overview of the pathway and its implications for your organisation.

Personal Predispositions

Personal predispositions are intrinsic traits and past experiences that make some individuals more susceptible to engaging in insider acts, especially when these predispositions are triggered by stress. These traits can manifest in several observable ways:

Serious Mental Health Disorders: Conditions such as substance addiction, anxiety disorders, or violent behaviour can impair judgment and increase vulnerability to risky decisions. Individuals with these disorders may struggle to cope with workplace stress, making them more likely to engage in harmful insider activities as a means of managing their mental health issues.
Social Skills and Decision-Making Bias: Poor social skills, such as bullying, unprofessional conduct, or frequent conflicts with colleagues, can isolate an individual and lead to a buildup of resentment or hostility towards their organisation. A consistent pattern of poor decision-making, particularly in ethical dilemmas, can also signal a predisposition towards insider acts.
History of Rule Violations: An individual’s past behaviour is a significant indicator of future risk. Those with a history of rule violations, such as prior security breaches, harassment complaints, or misuse of company resources, have already demonstrated a disregard for rules and regulations, increasing the likelihood of more severe insider activities in the future.
Social Network Risks: The influence of an individual’s social connections – both inside and outside the organisation – can also play a role. Relationships with disgruntled colleagues or external entities that encourage or facilitate unethical actions can heighten the risk of insider acts, as these networks can offer validation or support for harmful behaviours.

These personal predispositions create a foundation for potential insider risk, which can be further exacerbated by external stressors. Understanding these predispositions allows organisations to identify at-risk individuals early and implement appropriate interventions.

Organisational Predispositions

Organisational culture and practices can also play a significant role in insider risk. Predispositions include:

Lack of Policy Enforcement: Inconsistent application of rules can create an environment where insider acts are more likely.
Reluctance to Report: Fear of repercussions or a culture of excessive trust can lead to underreporting of concerning behaviours.

The “trust trap” is a crucial concept where organisations’ trust in employees can lead to less monitoring, creating a false sense of security until a significant incident occurs.

Stressors

Stressors are significant events or pressures in an individual’s personal, professional, or financial life that can trigger underlying predispositions, pushing an individual further along the pathway towards insider risk. These stressors can take various forms:

Negative Work-Related Events: Poor performance evaluations, demotions, and reprimands can increase risk.
Personal Life Stressors: Divorce, death in the family, or financial difficulties can exacerbate vulnerabilities.

Recognising these stressors and how they interact with personal predispositions is crucial for organisations aiming to mitigate insider risk. By addressing stressors early and providing support to employees under duress, organisations can prevent the escalation of risk and potentially avert insider acts before they occur.

Concerning Behaviours

Concerning behaviours are observable actions that suggest an individual may be progressing towards committing insider acts. These behaviours often serve as warning signs and typically occur before more severe or damaging actions are taken. Identifying and addressing these behaviours early can be crucial in preventing insider threats.

Rule Violations: One of the most common early indicators of potential insider risk is a history of rule violations. These can range from minor infractions, such as tardiness or inappropriate use of company resources, to more serious offences like drug use, persistent conflicts with coworkers, or security breaches. When such behaviours are ignored or left unchecked, they can create a pattern of misconduct that may escalate into more serious insider activities.
Counterproductive Work Behaviours (CWB): CWBs are actions that directly harm the organisation or its members. These behaviours can include anything from neglecting work responsibilities and spreading rumours to more severe actions like sabotage or theft. CWBs often indicate an underlying dissatisfaction or resentment towards the organisation. If these behaviours are not addressed promptly, they can escalate, leading to significant harm to the organisation. For instance, an employee who feels undervalued may start with minor acts of defiance but could eventually resort to damaging the organisation’s assets or reputation.

It is essential for organisations to foster a culture where concerning behaviours are reported and addressed without fear of retaliation. However, many employees are reluctant to report such behaviours due to concerns about potential backlash, uncertainty about the consequences, or fear of being labelled a troublemaker. Overcoming this reluctance through training, clear reporting channels, and assurance of confidentiality is critical to effectively mitigating insider risk.

Crime Script

At the final stage of the Critical Pathway to Insider Risk, individuals who have committed to carrying out insider acts begin detailed planning and preparation. This phase, known as the “crime script,” involves the insider engaging in activities necessary to execute their plan.

Planning and Preparation: Insiders start by gathering information, conducting surveillance, and acquiring the resources or skills needed to carry out their intended actions. This might include learning how to bypass security measures or gaining access to sensitive data.
Testing and Rehearsal: Before executing the act, insiders often test or rehearse their plan to ensure success and avoid detection. These activities might involve probing security systems or making small, calculated moves to gauge the organisation’s response.

By identifying and intervening in this stage, organisations can disrupt the insider’s plans before any significant harm is done.

Mitigating Factors

Mitigating factors are the positive influences and interventions that can prevent individuals from progressing along the Critical Pathway to Insider Risk. Examples of these factors include:

Ethical Principles and Resilience: Individuals with strong ethics and personal resilience are less likely to engage in insider acts, even under stress. Organisations can foster these traits through training and development.
Social Support Networks: A supportive environment both within and outside the workplace can help employees cope with stressors, reducing the likelihood of insider acts.
Proactive Organisational Interventions: Regular check-ins, counselling services, and open communication channels can address issues early, preventing escalation.
Consistent Policy Enforcement: Fair and consistent enforcement of rules fosters trust and reduces the likelihood of rule violations and concerning behaviours.
Training and Awareness: Regular training on security and ethics empowers employees to act responsibly and report potential risks.

Integrating these factors helps create a secure environment where potential insider threats are identified and addressed before they escalate.

Leveraging the CPIR with the S6 Insider Risk Framework

The Signpost Six Insider Risk Framework builds upon the human and psychological insights provided by the Critical Pathway to Insider Risk (CPIR). By understanding the psychological journey of potential insiders, the S6 framework translates this knowledge into tangible, practical solutions and measurements tailored to organisational needs.

In essence, the S6 framework takes the rich psychological and behavioural insights of the CPIR and applies them to create a comprehensive, practical approach to insider risk management. This ensures that organisations are not only aware of potential risks but are also equipped with the tools and strategies to effectively manage them.

Conclusion

Understanding and managing insider risk is critical for any organisation aiming to protect its assets, reputation, and people. The Critical Pathway to Insider Risk (CPIR) provides a valuable framework for identifying the stages and factors that can lead to insider threats. By recognising personal and organisational predispositions, stressors, concerning behaviours, and the crime script, organisations can better anticipate and mitigate these risks.

Incorporating the insights from both the CPIR and the S6 framework, organisations can develop a robust, proactive approach to insider risk management, ensuring that they are well-equipped to address and neutralise potential threats before they materialise.